These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

454 related items for PubMed ID: 19719806

  • 1. Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs.
    Bartling H, Wanger P, Martin L.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 87(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 19719806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP, Aiello LM, Cavallerano JD, Katalinic P, Hock K, Tolson A, Kirby R, Bursell SE, Aiello LP.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Computer-assisted, interactive fundus image processing for macular drusen quantitation.
    Shin DS, Javornik NB, Berger JW.
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1119-25. PubMed ID: 10366080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
    Maberley D, Morris A, Hay D, Chang A, Hall L, Mandava N.
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
    Neubauer AS, Rothschuh A, Ulbig MW, Blum M.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prospective evaluation of digital non-stereo color fundus photography as a screening tool in age-related macular degeneration.
    Pirbhai A, Sheidow T, Hooper P.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 139(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15767053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
    Musadiq M, Patsoura E, Hughes S, Yang YC.
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Use of fundus imaging in quantification of age-related macular change.
    Bartlett H, Eperjesi F.
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 52(6):655-71. PubMed ID: 18029272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Non-mydriatic digital macular photography: how good is the second eye photograph?
    Aung KZ, Robman L, Chong EW, English DR, Giles GG, Guymer RH.
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 16(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 19874148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.