These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

489 related items for PubMed ID: 19723986

  • 1. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial.
    Gioe TJ, Glynn J, Sembrano J, Suthers K, Santos ER, Singh J.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Sep; 91(9):2104-12. PubMed ID: 19723986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs: surgical technique.
    Luna JT, Sembrano JN, Gioe TJ.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():240-9. PubMed ID: 20844179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Randomized clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically detectable differences at five years.
    Kalisvaart MM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Mar 21; 94(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 22437996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
    Vogt JC, Saarbach C.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May 21; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized prospective study comparing mobile-bearing against fixed-bearing PFC Sigma cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties with ten-year minimum follow-up.
    Powell AJ, Crua E, Chong BC, Gordon R, McAuslan A, Pitto RP, Clatworthy MG.
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct 21; 100-B(10):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 30295539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy.
    Hernigou P, Huys M, Pariat J, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Dubory A.
    Int Orthop; 2018 Feb 21; 42(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 28667383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.
    Choi WC, Lee S, Seong SC, Jung JH, Lee MC.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov 17; 92(16):2634-42. PubMed ID: 20952606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
    Hofstede SN, Nouta KA, Jacobs W, van Hooff ML, Wymenga AB, Pijls BG, Nelissen RG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb 04; 2015(2):CD003130. PubMed ID: 25650566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study.
    Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug 18; 92(10):1911-20. PubMed ID: 20720134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison of early clinical outcomes between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty for the valgus knee].
    Zhou KP, Zhang XB, Zhang GD, Yang G, Qi X.
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2015 Oct 18; 28(10):897-902. PubMed ID: 26727780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Risk of revision for fixed versus mobile-bearing primary total knee replacements.
    Namba RS, Inacio MC, Paxton EW, Ake CF, Wang C, Gross TP, Marinac-Dabic D, Sedrakyan A.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov 07; 94(21):1929-35. PubMed ID: 23138235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Marr JT.
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep 07; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty in the same patients.
    Kim YH, Park JW.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Nov 05; 96(21):1807-13. PubMed ID: 25378508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components.
    Gioe TJ, Bowman KR.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Nov 05; (380):108-15. PubMed ID: 11064980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial.
    Chaudhary R, Beaupré LA, Johnston DW.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec 05; 90(12):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19047702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fixation of high-flexion total knee prostheses: five-year follow-up results of a four-arm randomized controlled clinical and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study.
    Nieuwenhuijse MJ, van der Voort P, Kaptein BL, van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Valstar ER, Nelissen RG.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Oct 02; 95(19):e1411-11. PubMed ID: 24088976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.