These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

397 related items for PubMed ID: 19739755

  • 1. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U, Boldt JB, Pedersen MS, Lunner T, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S, Li L, Wu X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1673-82. PubMed ID: 18345855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS, Chang PS, Simpson BD, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Kim G, Lu Y, Hu Y, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19739761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.
    Narayanan A, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3083-93. PubMed ID: 23654411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of spectral resolution on the intelligibility of ideal binary masked speech.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):EL59-64. PubMed ID: 18396922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Perceptual learning for speech in noise after application of binary time-frequency masks.
    Ahmadi M, Gross VL, Sinex DG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1687-92. PubMed ID: 23464038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J, Xia R, Fang Q, Li A, Pan J, Yan Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D, Jourdes V, Lorenzi C.
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS, Iyer N.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.
    Sinex DG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2390-6. PubMed ID: 23556604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.