These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


138 related items for PubMed ID: 19740498

  • 1. Let's talk about smear tests: social marketing for the National Cervical Screening Programme.
    Bethune GR, Lewis HJ.
    Public Health; 2009 Sep; 123 Suppl 1():e17-22. PubMed ID: 19740498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF, Krebs LU, Murphy JR, Shen Z, Ryals T.
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995 Sep; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
    Thoresen SO, Skare GB, Sandvin O.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug 10; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.
    Kernohan EE.
    Br J Cancer Suppl; 1996 Sep 10; 29():S42-6. PubMed ID: 8782798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influencing the parents of children aged 9-13 years: findings from the VERB campaign.
    Price SM, Huhman M, Potter LD.
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Jun 10; 34(6 Suppl):S267-74. PubMed ID: 18471607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
    Corkrey R, Parkinson L, Bates L.
    Prev Med; 2005 Aug 10; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups.
    Anderson JO, Mullins RM, Siahpush M, Spittal MJ, Wakefield M.
    Health Educ Res; 2009 Oct 10; 24(5):867-75. PubMed ID: 19342422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance.
    Mauad EC, Nicolau SM, Moreira LF, Haikel RL, Longatto-Filho A, Baracat EC.
    Rural Remote Health; 2009 Oct 10; 9(3):1241. PubMed ID: 19778158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The extent of cervical screening in New Zealand women.
    Bonita R, Paul C.
    N Z Med J; 1991 Aug 28; 104(918):349-52. PubMed ID: 1891131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience.
    Sepúlveda C, Prado R.
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2005 Aug 28; 29(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 16188399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M, Hoque E, Kader SB.
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug 28; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Saving children's lives: a communication campaign in Egypt.
    Hirschhorn N.
    Dev Commun Rep; 1985 Aug 28; (51):13-4. PubMed ID: 12340538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.