These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
605 related items for PubMed ID: 19745797
1. The value of laparoscopic surgery to stage gynecological cancers: present and future. Mettler L, Meinhold-Heerlein I. Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):319-37. PubMed ID: 19745797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer. Kuoppala T, Tomás E, Heinonen PK. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome. Pellegrino A, Vizza E, Fruscio R, Villa A, Corrado G, Villa M, Dell'Anna T, Vitobello D. Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Díaz-Feijoo B, Gil-Moreno A, Pérez-Benavente MA, Morchón S, Martínez-Palones JM, Xercavins J. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Sert B, Abeler V. Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Fusco A, Malzoni C. Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases. Scribner DR, Walker JL, Johnson GA, McMeekin SD, Gold MA, Mannel RS. Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, Pouly JL, Glowaczover E, Raiga J, Bruhat M. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 6(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 8038406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer. Scribner DR, Mannel RS, Walker JL, Johnson GA. Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic limphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer. Pellegrino A, Signorelli M, Fruscio R, Villa A, Buda A, Beretta P, Garbi A, Vitobello D. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 May; 279(5):655-60. PubMed ID: 18795308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010 May; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic cancers. Schlaerth AC, Abu-Rustum NR. Oncologist; 2006 Sep; 11(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 16951393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Li G, Yan X, Shang H, Wang G, Chen L, Han Y. Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review. Smith AL, Pareja R, Ramirez PT. Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19745798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients. Chen Y, Xu H, Li Y, Wang D, Li J, Yuan J, Liang Z. Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival. Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ. Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 14984942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Fader AN, Escobar PF. Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Levenback C. Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]