These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
456 related items for PubMed ID: 19751776
1. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation. Thomas SJ, Gonsalvez CJ, Johnstone SJ. Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Kirmizi-Alsan E, Bayraktaroglu Z, Gurvit H, Keskin YH, Emre M, Demiralp T. Brain Res; 2006 Aug 09; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation. Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Markovska V, Dimoska A, Clarke AR. Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May 09; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task. Smith JL, Smith EA, Provost AL, Heathcote A. Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar 09; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study. Jonkman LM. Brain Res; 2006 Jun 30; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task. Tian Y, Yao D. Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct 30; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks. Gajewski PD, Falkenstein M. Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar 30; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease. Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S. Neuropsychologia; 2005 Mar 30; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study. Burden MJ, Andrew C, Saint-Amour D, Meintjes EM, Molteno CD, Hoyme HE, Robinson LK, Khaole N, Nelson CA, Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov 30; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ. Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug 30; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components. Benikos N, Johnstone SJ, Roodenrys SJ. Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar 30; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Altered effect of preceding response execution on inhibitory processing in children with AD/HD: An ERP study. Inoue Y, Inagaki M, Gunji A, Furushima W, Okada H, Sasaki H, Omori T, Takeichi H, Kaga M. Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Aug 30; 77(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20483364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. Bekker EM, Kenemans JL, Verbaten MN. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb 30; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ. Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb 30; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR. Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr 30; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials. Vallesi A, Stuss DT, McIntosh AR, Picton TW. Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan 30; 47(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19022270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task. De Blasio FM, Barry RJ. Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul 30; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task. Kato Y, Endo H, Kizuka T. Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May 30; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship of N2 and P3 to inhibitory processing of social drinkers in a Go/NoGo task. Oddy BW, Barry RJ. Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun 30; 72(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 19250950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task. Barry RJ, Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR, Rushby JA, Brown CR, McKenzie DN. Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec 30; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]