These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 19769516

  • 1. Biomechanics of C-7 transfacet screw fixation.
    Horn EM, Reyes PM, Baek S, Senoglu M, Theodore N, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Sep; 11(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 19769516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J, Ji W, Zhou R, Huang Z, Liu S, Zhu Q.
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR.
    Spine J; 2007 Jun; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws.
    Traynelis VC, Sherman J, Nottmeier E, Singh V, McGilvray K, Puttlitz CM, Leahy PD.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 May; 20(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 24559463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
    McGirt MJ, Sutter EG, Xu R, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A.
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Do facet screws provide the required stability in lumbar fixation? A biomechanical comparison of the Boucher technique and pedicular fixation in primary and circumferential fusions.
    Agarwala A, Bucklen B, Muzumdar A, Moldavsky M, Khalil S.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21849224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
    Bozkuş H, Senoğlu M, Baek S, Sawa AG, Ozer AF, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20121354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
    Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R, Newton P.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
    Liu GY, Xu RM, Ma WH, Sun SH, Huang L, Ying JW, Jiang WY.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug 05; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling.
    Ferrara LA, Secor JL, Jin BH, Wakefield A, Inceoglu S, Benzel EC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun 15; 28(12):1226-34. PubMed ID: 12811265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of two new atlantoaxial fixation techniques with C1-2 transarticular screw-graft fixation.
    Härtl R, Chamberlain RH, Fifield MS, Chou D, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Oct 15; 5(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 17048771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
    Little AS, Brasiliense LB, Lazaro BC, Reyes PM, Dickman CA, Crawford NR.
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar 15; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
    Xu R, McGirt MJ, Sutter EG, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec 15; 13(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 21121745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
    Akesen B, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb 15; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    Rhee JM, Kraiwattanapong C, Hutton WC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov 01; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM, Hu N, Umekoji H, Sciubba DM, Jallo GI, McAfee PC, Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct 01; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
    Scheer JK, Tang JA, Deviren V, Acosta F, Buckley JM, Pekmezci M, McClellan RT, Ames CP.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar 01; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.