These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


373 related items for PubMed ID: 19772874

  • 1. The consequences of stimulus intensity on sensory nerve action potentials.
    Nashed J, Calder K, Trachter R, McLean L.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Dec 15; 185(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 19772874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effects of age, gender, and body mass index on amplitude of sensory nerve action potentials: multivariate analyses.
    Fujimaki Y, Kuwabara S, Sato Y, Isose S, Shibuya K, Sekiguchi Y, Nasu S, Noto Y, Taniguchi J, Misawa S.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep 15; 120(9):1683-6. PubMed ID: 19640782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Two approaches to measure amplitude changes of the sensory nerve action potential over a length of nerve.
    van Aken SF, van Dijk JG.
    Muscle Nerve; 2003 Mar 15; 27(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 12635115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electrophysiologic analysis of snap amplitude in orthodromic and antidromic studies.
    Meythaler JM, Tuel SM, Cross LL, Reichart RT, Wertsch JJ.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep 15; 34(6):323-9. PubMed ID: 8001471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials obtained from all fingers on the same hand.
    Wee AS.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar 15; 42(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 11938595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spread of the radial SNAP: a pitfall in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using standard orthodromic sensory conduction study.
    Sonoo M, Tsaiweichao-Shozawa Y, Oshimi-Sekiguchi M, Hatanaka Y, Shimizu T.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar 15; 117(3):604-9. PubMed ID: 16403483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Supraorbital nerve conduction study in normal subjects.
    Therimadasamy A, Wilder-Smith EP, Lim AY, Yap YL, Yeo M, Naidu S, Lee SJ.
    Muscle Nerve; 2012 Apr 15; 45(4):603-4. PubMed ID: 22431095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Submaximal stimulation and f-wave parameters.
    Fisher MA, Zhu JQ, Uddin MK, Grindstaff P.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct 15; 25(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18791474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A novel method to measure sensory nerve conduction of the supraclavicular nerve.
    Hemmi S, Kurokawa K, Nagai T, Murakami T, Sunada Y.
    Muscle Nerve; 2014 Dec 15; 50(6):1005-7. PubMed ID: 25042692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Nomogram for determining lower limit of the sural response.
    Kokotis P, Mandellos D, Papagianni A, Karandreas N.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Apr 15; 121(4):561-3. PubMed ID: 20097608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.