These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 19779545

  • 1. A novel scoring approach for protein co-purification data reveals high interaction specificity.
    Yu X, Ivanic J, Wallqvist A, Reifman J.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Sep; 5(9):e1000515. PubMed ID: 19779545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identifying binary protein-protein interactions from affinity purification mass spectrometry data.
    Zhang XF, Ou-Yang L, Hu X, Dai DQ.
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct 05; 16():745. PubMed ID: 26438428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A sampling framework for incorporating quantitative mass spectrometry data in protein interaction analysis.
    Tucker G, Loh PR, Berger B.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct 04; 14():299. PubMed ID: 24093595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computational detection of protein complexes in AP-MS experiments.
    Choi H.
    Proteomics; 2012 May 04; 12(10):1663-8. PubMed ID: 22711593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Computational framework for analysis of prey-prey associations in interaction proteomics identifies novel human protein-protein interactions and networks.
    Saha S, Dazard JE, Xu H, Ewing RM.
    J Proteome Res; 2012 Sep 07; 11(9):4476-87. PubMed ID: 22845868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A two-step framework for inferring direct protein-protein interaction network from AP-MS data.
    Tian B, Zhao C, Gu F, He Z.
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Sep 21; 11(Suppl 4):82. PubMed ID: 28950876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Detection of protein complexes from affinity purification/mass spectrometry data.
    Cai B, Wang H, Zheng H, Wang H.
    BMC Syst Biol; 2012 Sep 21; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. PubMed ID: 23282282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network.
    Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, Lemmens I, Venkatesan K, Sahalie J, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Gebreab F, Li N, Simonis N, Hao T, Rual JF, Dricot A, Vazquez A, Murray RR, Simon C, Tardivo L, Tam S, Svrzikapa N, Fan C, de Smet AS, Motyl A, Hudson ME, Park J, Xin X, Cusick ME, Moore T, Boone C, Snyder M, Roth FP, Barabási AL, Tavernier J, Hill DE, Vidal M.
    Science; 2008 Oct 03; 322(5898):104-10. PubMed ID: 18719252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. ROCS: a reproducibility index and confidence score for interaction proteomics studies.
    Dazard JE, Saha S, Ewing RM.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun 08; 13():128. PubMed ID: 22682516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The bait compatibility index: computational bait selection for interaction proteomics experiments.
    Saha S, Kaur P, Ewing RM.
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct 01; 9(10):4972-81. PubMed ID: 20731387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reinforce: An Ensemble Approach for Inferring PPI Network from AP-MS Data.
    Tian B, Duan Q, Zhao C, Teng B, He Z.
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019 Oct 01; 16(2):365-376. PubMed ID: 28534782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Computational and informatics strategies for identification of specific protein interaction partners in affinity purification mass spectrometry experiments.
    Nesvizhskii AI.
    Proteomics; 2012 May 01; 12(10):1639-55. PubMed ID: 22611043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of protein abundance on high-throughput protein-protein interaction detection.
    Ivanic J, Yu X, Wallqvist A, Reifman J.
    PLoS One; 2009 Jun 05; 4(6):e5815. PubMed ID: 19503833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data.
    Choi H, Larsen B, Lin ZY, Breitkreutz A, Mellacheruvu D, Fermin D, Qin ZS, Tyers M, Gingras AC, Nesvizhskii AI.
    Nat Methods; 2011 Jan 05; 8(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 21131968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks.
    Han JD, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick ME, Vidal M.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul 05; 23(7):839-44. PubMed ID: 16003372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. BioPlex Display: An Interactive Suite for Large-Scale AP-MS Protein-Protein Interaction Data.
    Schweppe DK, Huttlin EL, Harper JW, Gygi SP.
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Jan 05; 17(1):722-726. PubMed ID: 29054129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Bayesian approach for estimating protein-protein interactions by integrating structural and non-structural biological data.
    Ur Rehman H, Bari I, Ali A, Mahmood H.
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Nov 21; 13(12):2592-2602. PubMed ID: 29028065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Predicting co-complexed protein pairs using genomic and proteomic data integration.
    Zhang LV, Wong SL, King OD, Roth FP.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr 16; 5():38. PubMed ID: 15090078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. SAINT-MS1: protein-protein interaction scoring using label-free intensity data in affinity purification-mass spectrometry experiments.
    Choi H, Glatter T, Gstaiger M, Nesvizhskii AI.
    J Proteome Res; 2012 Apr 06; 11(4):2619-24. PubMed ID: 22352807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Construction of co-complex score matrix for protein complex prediction from AP-MS data.
    Xie Z, Kwoh CK, Li XL, Wu M.
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul 01; 27(13):i159-66. PubMed ID: 21685066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.