These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

318 related items for PubMed ID: 19780303

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The reporting rates of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and their human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up results: A comparison between ThinPrep and SurePath preparations.
    Sinclair WD, Gibbons-Fideler IS, Shen R, Li Z.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):959-963. PubMed ID: 33991062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates.
    Rozemeijer K, Penning C, Siebers AG, Naber SK, Matthijsse SM, van Ballegooijen M, van Kemenade FJ, de Kok IM.
    Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Jan; 27(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 26458884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
    Hessling JJ, Raso DS, Schiffer B, Callicott J, Husain M, Taylor D.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting.
    Sykes PH, Harker DY, Miller A, Whitehead M, Neal H, Wells JE, Peddie D.
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 18823488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
    Della Palma P, Moresco L, Giorgi Rossi P.
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012 Oct; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
    Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, Khoo US, Ng AW.
    Cancer; 2003 Dec 25; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears.
    Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G, Nicolau SM, Stávale JN, Focchi J, Castelo A, Dôres GB, Mielzynska-Lohnas I, Lorincz A, Rodrigues de Lima G.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr 25; 30(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 15048954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of conventional and liquid-based cytology in a colposcopic setting.
    Hussein T, Desai M, Tomlinson A, Kitchener HC.
    BJOG; 2005 Nov 25; 112(11):1542-6. PubMed ID: 16225576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Critical Analyses of the Introduction of Liquid-Based Cytology in a Public Health Service of the State of São Paulo, Brazil.
    Longatto-Filho A, Levi JE, Martins TR, Cohen D, Cury L, Villa LL, Eluf-Neto J.
    Acta Cytol; 2015 Nov 25; 59(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 26279162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Liquid-based cytology: is this the way forward for cervical screening?
    Moseley RP, Paget S.
    Cytopathology; 2002 Apr 25; 13(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 11952745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.