These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. When it comes to inbreeding: slower is better. Reed DH. Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4521-2. PubMed ID: 20078763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A genomewide assessment of inbreeding depression: gene number, function, and mode of action. Ayroles JF, Hughes KA, Rowe KC, Reedy MM, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Drnevich JM, Cáceres CE, Paige KN. Conserv Biol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):920-30. PubMed ID: 19627320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment. Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Pérez-Figueroa A, Fernández B, Fernández J, Caballero A. J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions. Kristensen TN, Knudsen MR, Loeschcke V. Genetica; 2011 Apr; 139(4):441-51. PubMed ID: 21416261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Properties of inbred Drosophila melanogaster lines obtained from a population selected for an increased rate of embryonic development]. Neĭfakh AA, Minin AA, Ozerova SG, Abramova NA. Genetika; 1996 Sep; 32(9):1206-12. PubMed ID: 9026462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The mutation rate and the distribution of mutational effects of viability and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. García-Dorado A, Monedero JL, López-Fanjul C. Genetica; 1998 Sep; 102-103(1-6):255-65. PubMed ID: 9720284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]