These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

594 related items for PubMed ID: 19781686

  • 1. Comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis vs laser subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia.
    de Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA, Gil-Cazorla R, Drake P.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 148(6):830-6.e1. PubMed ID: 19781686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA, de Benito-Llopis L, García-González M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison between three- and six-month postoperative refractive and visual results after laser epithelial keratomileusis with mitomycin C.
    de Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA, Hernández-Verdejo JL.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):71-76.e2. PubMed ID: 18774546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis to correct myopic astigmatism.
    Gros-Otero J, Garcia-Gonzalez M, Teus MA, Iglesias-Iglesias M, Gimenez-Vallejo C.
    J Optom; 2018 Jan; 11(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 27751694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM, Ghanem RC, Sayegh RR, Hallak JA, Azar DT.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis with and without mitomycin C performed to correct myopia in thin corneas: a 15-month follow-up.
    de Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA, Sánchez-Pina JM, Fuentes I.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 145(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 18342832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Learning curve of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: influence on visual and refractive results.
    Teus MA, de Benito-Llopis L, Sánchez-Pina JM.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1381-5. PubMed ID: 17662428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap.
    Beerthuizen JJ, Siebelt E.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 17662427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Efficacy of surface ablation retreatments using mitomycin C.
    de Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 150(3):376-380.e2. PubMed ID: 20570239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia.
    Teus MA, de Benito-Llopis L, Sánchez-Pina JM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):605-10. PubMed ID: 17632309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Outcomes of wavefront-optimized surface ablation.
    Randleman JB, Loft ES, Banning CS, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 17337064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner MD.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia.
    Kim JK, Kim SS, Lee HK, Lee IS, Seong GJ, Kim EK, Han SH.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1405-11. PubMed ID: 15210215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy without mitomycin-C for the treatment of high myopia.
    Aydin B, Cagil N, Erdoğan S, Erdurmus M, Hasiripi H.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1280-7. PubMed ID: 18655977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Epithelial healing and clinical outcomes in excimer laser photorefractive surgery following three epithelial removal techniques: mechanical, alcohol, and excimer laser.
    Lee HK, Lee KS, Kim JK, Kim HC, Seo KR, Kim EK.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 15652828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Femtosecond sub-bowman keratomileusis: a prospective, long-term, intereye comparison of safety and outcomes of 90- versus 100-μm flaps.
    Prakash G, Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Chari M, Agarwal A, Jacob S, Srivastava D.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Oct; 152(4):582-590.e2. PubMed ID: 21683336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Advanced personalized nomogram for myopic laser surgery: first 100 eyes.
    Lapid-Gortzak R, van der Linden JW, van der Meulen IJ, Nieuwendaal CP.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1881-5. PubMed ID: 19006733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D.
    de Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA, Sánchez-Pina JM.
    J Refract Surg; 2008 May; 24(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 18494345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.