These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


142 related items for PubMed ID: 19813198

  • 1. Added sampling improves reproducibility of multipoint motor unit estimates.
    Goyal N, Salameh JS, Baldassari LE, David WS.
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jan; 41(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 19813198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validation of an incremental motor unit number estimation technique in rabbits.
    David WS, Goyal N, Henry FP, Baldassari LE, Redmond RW.
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jun; 41(6):794-9. PubMed ID: 20169589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Size does matter: the influence of motor unit potential size on statistical motor unit number estimates in healthy subjects.
    Blok JH, van Dijk JP, Drenthen J, Maathuis EM, Stegeman DF.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 121(10):1772-80. PubMed ID: 20447861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Motor unit number estimation using high-density surface electromyography.
    van Dijk JP, Blok JH, Lapatki BG, van Schaik IN, Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 119(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18037342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Number of Edb motor units estimated using an adapted multiple point stimulation method: normal values and longitudinal studies in ALS and peripheral neuropathies.
    Albrecht E, Kuntzer T.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 15036050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of contraction intensity on motor unit number estimates of the tibialis anterior.
    McNeil CJ, Doherty TJ, Stashuk DW, Rice CL.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1342-7. PubMed ID: 15876553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An improved approach to the evaluation of the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve.
    Witmer B, DiBenedetto M, Kang CG.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 42(8):485-93. PubMed ID: 12489350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reduction in the motor unit number estimate (MUNE) after cerebral infarction.
    Arasaki K, Igarashi O, Ichikawa Y, Machida T, Shirozu I, Hyodo A, Ushijima R.
    J Neurol Sci; 2006 Dec 01; 250(1-2):27-32. PubMed ID: 16904126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Inter-rater reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in the tibialis anterior muscle.
    Boe SG, Dalton BH, Harwood B, Doherty TJ, Rice CL.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May 01; 120(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 19375385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. MUNIX and incremental stimulation MUNE in ALS patients and control subjects.
    Furtula J, Johnsen B, Christensen PB, Pugdahl K, Bisgaard C, Christensen MK, Arentsen J, Frydenberg M, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar 01; 124(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 23040293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.