These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

111 related items for PubMed ID: 19828986

  • 1. Synetic superimposition of dental 3D data: application in twin studies.
    Smith RN, Townsend G, Chen K, Brook A.
    Front Oral Biol; 2009; 13():142-147. PubMed ID: 19828986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Tooth size and morphology in twins.
    Kabban M, Fearne J, Jovanovski V, Zou L.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2001 Sep; 11(5):333-9. PubMed ID: 11572263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Tong H, Enciso R, Van Elslande D, Major PW, Sameshima GT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
    Rajshekar M, Julian R, Williams AM, Tennant M, Forrest A, Walsh LJ, Wilson G, Blizzard L.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An accurate and efficient method for occlusal tooth wear assessment using 3D digital dental models.
    Gkantidis N, Dritsas K, Ren Y, Halazonetis D, Katsaros C.
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun 22; 10(1):10103. PubMed ID: 32572141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
    Jacquet W, Nyssen E, Ibel G, Vannet BV.
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May 22; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov 22; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of digital study model superimposition methods using implant-supported crowns and best-fit algorithms.
    Meade MJ, Weir T, Byrne G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Oct 22; 166(4):384-392.e2. PubMed ID: 39046381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Roşu S, Zetu I, Ogodescu A, Veiszenbacher E, Mártha KI.
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014 Oct 22; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
    Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Townsend GC.
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May 22; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-dimensional digitization: method for evaluating morphological differences between teeth.
    Soma K, Kuroki T, Nakamura T, Miura F.
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1991 Mar 22; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2025911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays.
    Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Anderson PJ, Townsend GC.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov 22; 14(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 22008304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH, Chiang WC, Lo LJ, Sheng-Pin Hsu S, Wang CH, Wan SY.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov 22; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models.
    Henninger E, Vasilakos G, Halazonetis D, Gkantidis N.
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul 19; 9(1):10501. PubMed ID: 31324833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. How studies of twins can inform our understanding of dental morphology.
    Townsend G, Hughes T, Bockmann M, Smith R, Brook A.
    Front Oral Biol; 2009 Jul 19; 13():136-141. PubMed ID: 19828985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Defining new dental phenotypes using 3-D image analysis to enhance discrimination and insights into biological processes.
    Smith R, Zaitoun H, Coxon T, Karmo M, Kaur G, Townsend G, Harris EF, Brook A.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Dec 19; 54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S118-25. PubMed ID: 18644585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology.
    Bailey E, Nelson G, Miller AJ, Andrews L, Johnson E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr 19; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. 3D-3D facial superimposition between monozygotic twins: A novel morphological approach to the assessment of differences due to environmental factors.
    Gibelli D, Pucciarelli V, Poppa P, De Angelis D, Cummaudo M, Pisoni L, Codari M, Cattaneo C, Sforza C.
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 Mar 19; 31():33-37. PubMed ID: 29291466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Three-dimensional data fusion method for tooth crown and root based on curvature continuity algorithm].
    Zhao YJ, Liu Y, Sun YC, Wang Y.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Aug 18; 49(4):719-723. PubMed ID: 28816295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
    Lin X, Chen T, Liu J, Jiang T, Yu D, Shen SG.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan 18; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.