These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


434 related items for PubMed ID: 19833112

  • 1. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG, Dinkelbach A, Schubö A.
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan 11; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A, Müller HJ.
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug 04; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C, Di Lollo V, McDonald JJ.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr 04; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S, Doallo S, Vizoso C, Cadaveira F.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep 04; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Time-frequency analysis of target detection reveals an early interface between bottom-up and top-down processes in the gamma-band.
    Busch NA, Schadow J, Fründ I, Herrmann CS.
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb 15; 29(4):1106-16. PubMed ID: 16246588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Neural correlates of the stare-in-the-crowd effect.
    Doi H, Ueda K, Shinohara K.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar 15; 47(4):1053-60. PubMed ID: 19046979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN, Schoenfeld MA, Heinze HJ, Hopf JM.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep 15; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Feature processing during visual search in normal aging: electrophysiological evidence.
    Lorenzo-López L, Amenedo E, Cadaveira F.
    Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Jul 15; 29(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 17346855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes.
    Ferrari V, Codispoti M, Cardinale R, Bradley MM.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Oct 15; 20(10):1753-61. PubMed ID: 18370595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Texture segmentation and visual search for pop-out targets. An ERP study.
    Schubö A, Schröger E, Meinecke C.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov 15; 21(3):317-34. PubMed ID: 15511648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field.
    Shoji H, Skrandies W.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug 15; 61(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16356572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.
    Zhang D, Zhou X, Martens S.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct 15; 47(12):2604-14. PubMed ID: 19465037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrophysiological correlates of detecting a visual target and detecting its absence: the role of feature dimensions.
    Akyürek EG, Dinkelbach A, Schubö A, Müller HJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep 15; 48(11):3365-70. PubMed ID: 20633570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.