These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1539 related items for PubMed ID: 19833488
21. Boosting method for nonlinear transformation models with censored survival data. Lu W, Li L. Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 18344565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data. Biedermann A, Taroni F, Bozza S. Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec 15; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations. Delen D, Oztekin A, Kong ZJ. Artif Intell Med; 2010 May 15; 49(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20153956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic Bayesian networks II: an application in the domain of cardiac surgery. Verduijn M, Rosseel PM, Peek N, de Jonge E, de Mol BA. J Biomed Inform; 2007 Dec 15; 40(6):619-30. PubMed ID: 17709302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches? Nie L, Chu H, Feng S. Stat Med; 2009 Sep 10; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A novel algorithm for scalable and accurate Bayesian network learning. Brown LE, Tsamardinos I, Aliferis CF. Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004 Sep 10; 107(Pt 1):711-5. PubMed ID: 15360905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving Cox survival analysis with a neural-Bayesian approach. Bakker B, Heskes T, Neijt J, Kappen B. Stat Med; 2004 Oct 15; 23(19):2989-3012. PubMed ID: 15351957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Causal inference in biomolecular pathways using a Bayesian network approach and an Implicit method. Ben Hassen H, Masmoudi A, Rebai A. J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug 21; 253(4):717-24. PubMed ID: 18541271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Bayesian variable selection for the analysis of microarray data with censored outcomes. Sha N, Tadesse MG, Vannucci M. Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep 15; 22(18):2262-8. PubMed ID: 16845144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of treatment effect adjusting for dependent censoring using the IPCW method: an application to a large primary prevention study for coronary events (MEGA study). Yoshida M, Matsuyama Y, Ohashi Y, MEGA Study Group. Clin Trials; 2007 Sep 15; 4(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 17848493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Artificial neural network for the joint modelling of discrete cause-specific hazards. Biganzoli EM, Boracchi P, Ambrogi F, Marubini E. Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun 15; 37(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 16730963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models. Martinussen T, Aalen OO, Scheike TH. Biometrics; 2008 Mar 15; 64(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 17608786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]