These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

955 related items for PubMed ID: 19840650

  • 1. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV, Kandian S, Mala K, Bhat KS, Acharya S.
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT.
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, Prati C.
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
    Kaya S, Yiğit-Özer S, Adigüzel Ö.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Ahir B, Parekh V, Katyayan MK, Katyayan PA.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014 Oct; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal.
    Wu L, Mu Y, Deng X, Zhang S, Zhou D.
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 22341079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Goel S, Tewari S.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 19576804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.
    Lui JN, Kuah HG, Chen NN.
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 17368342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.