These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

164 related items for PubMed ID: 19852592

  • 1. Automated cephalometry: system performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria.
    Tanikawa C, Yagi M, Takada K.
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19852592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automatic recognition of anatomic features on cephalograms of preadolescent children.
    Tanikawa C, Yamamoto T, Yagi M, Takada K.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):812-20. PubMed ID: 20578850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, Chung R, Carey JP, Heo G, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshøj M, Melsen B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cephalometric norms for Bunt and Brahmin children of Dakshina Kannada based on McNamara's analysis.
    Bhat M, Sudha P, Tandon S.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Jun; 19(2):41-51. PubMed ID: 11692821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Kazandjian S, Kiliaridis S, Mavropoulos A.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscles with different facial types.
    Vianna-Lara MS, Caria PH, Tosello Dde O, Lara F, Amorim MM.
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 19413373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A, Nawa H, Kimura M, Yoshida K, Maeda M, Katsumata A, Ariji E, Goto S.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
    Frongia G, Piancino MG, Bracco AA, Crincoli V, Debernardi CL, Bracco P.
    Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
    Kim SJ, Park SB, Kim YI, Cho BH, Hwang DS.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. "Black Bone" MRI: a potential non-ionizing method for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis--a preliminary feasibility study.
    Eley KA, Watt-Smith SR, Golding SJ.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013 Dec; 42(10):20130236. PubMed ID: 24052254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Damstra J, Huddleston Slater JJ, Fourie Z, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Goracci C, Ferrari M.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Forensic norms of female and male Lebanese adults.
    Ayoub F, Yehia M, Rizk A, Al-Tannir M, Abi-Farah A, Hamadeh G.
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2008 Jun 01; 26(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 22689353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication system versus the hand-tracing method--a preliminary study.
    Singh P, Davies TI.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug 01; 33(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 20923935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-dimensional analysis system for orthognathic surgery patients with jaw deformities.
    Terajima M, Yanagita N, Ozeki K, Hoshino Y, Mori N, Goto TK, Tokumori K, Aoki Y, Nakasima A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul 01; 134(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 18617109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Labiolingual and mesiodistal positioning of maxillary permanent incisors during the eruption process.
    Cuoghi OA, Bertoz FA, de Mendonca MR, Santos EC, Li AT.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000 Jul 01; 25(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 11314347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Liu JK, Chen YT, Cheng KS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov 01; 118(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 11094367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods.
    Davis DN, Mackay F.
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May 01; 18(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 1911687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The relationship between overjet size and dentoalveolar compensation.
    Soliman NL, El-Batran MM, Abou-Zeid AW, Sarry El-Din AM, Zaki ME.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009 May 01; 20(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19553723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.