These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

109 related items for PubMed ID: 19853059

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules that aim to optimize treatment selection for musculoskeletal conditions.
    Stanton TR, Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Koes BW.
    Phys Ther; 2010 Jun; 90(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 20413577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
    Jaillon P.
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007 Jun; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical decision rules in radiology.
    Reed MH.
    Acad Radiol; 2006 May; 13(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 16627196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Personalized medicine and prediction of outcome in kidney transplant.
    Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS.
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2010 Nov; 56(5):817-9. PubMed ID: 20970023
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review.
    Toll DB, Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Moons KG.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1085-94. PubMed ID: 19208371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Psychological cue use and implications for a clinical decision support system.
    Buckingham CD.
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2002 Dec; 27(4):237-51. PubMed ID: 12745905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An ontological treatment of clinical prediction rules implementing the Alvarado score.
    Corrigan D, Taweel A, Fahey T, Arvanitis T, Delaney B.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013 Dec; 186():103-7. PubMed ID: 23542977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. New generation vs. first generation antipsychotics debate: pragmatic clinical trials and practice-based evidence.
    Jakovljević M.
    Psychiatr Danub; 2009 Dec; 21(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 19935477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Linking evidence-based medicine therapeutic summary measures to clinical decision analysis.
    Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Lyman GH.
    MedGenMed; 2000 Jan 13; 2(1):E6. PubMed ID: 11104452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making: a methodological guide.
    Arocha JF, Wang D, Patel VL.
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Apr 13; 38(2):154-71. PubMed ID: 15797004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.