These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

218 related items for PubMed ID: 19861122

  • 21. Screening of presumptive urinary tract infections by the automated urine sediment analyser sediMAX.
    Tessari A, Osti N, Scarin M.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 53 Suppl 2():s1503-8. PubMed ID: 26509783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.
    Laiwejpithaya S, Wongkrajang P, Reesukumal K, Bucha C, Meepanya S, Pattanavin C, Khejonnit V, Chuntarut A.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2018 Feb; 32(2):. PubMed ID: 28464263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Evaluation of the performances of the iQ(®)200 ELITE automated urine microscopy analyser and comparison with manual microscopy method].
    Dewulf G, Harrois D, Mazars E, Cattoen C, Canis F.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2011 Oct; 59(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 19942378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer.
    Ben-Ezra J, Bork L, McPherson RA.
    Clin Chem; 1998 Jan; 44(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 9550564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Automated counting of white blood cells in synovial fluid.
    de Jonge R, Brouwer R, Smit M, de Frankrijker-Merkestijn M, Dolhain RJ, Hazes JM, van Toorenenbergen AW, Lindemans J.
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2004 Feb; 43(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 14523225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.
    Yalcinkaya E, Erman H, Kirac E, Serifoglu A, Aksoy A, Isman FK, Cekmen MB.
    Medeni Med J; 2019 Feb; 34(3):244-251. PubMed ID: 32821445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy.
    Smith P, Morris A, Reller LB.
    Pathology; 2003 Apr; 35(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 12745465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Quantitative analysis of urine sediment using newly designed centrifuge tubes.
    Kim Y, Jin DC, Lee EJ, Lee DH, Chung HH, Kim M, Lim J, Lee A, Lee KY, Kang CS, Han K, Pai SH.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2002 Apr; 32(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 11848619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice.
    Delanghe JR, Kouri TT, Huber AR, Hannemann-Pohl K, Guder WG, Lun A, Sinha P, Stamminger G, Beier L.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2000 Nov; 301(1-2):1-18. PubMed ID: 11020458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer].
    Park J, Kim J.
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Performance evaluation of the Z2 coulter counter for WBC and RBC counting.
    Peng L, Wang W, Bai L.
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2007 Oct; 29(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 17824917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Reference limits for urine sediments performed on Sysmex UF-50].
    Steinmetz J, Henny J, Gueguen R.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004 Oct; 62(6):671-80. PubMed ID: 15563425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Benefits of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyser in routine urinalysis.
    van den Broek D, Keularts IM, Wielders JP, Kraaijenhagen RJ.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 46(11):1635-40. PubMed ID: 19012529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy.
    Manoni F, Tinello A, Fornasiero L, Hoffer P, Temporin V, Valverde S, Gessoni G.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 48(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 20482296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment.
    Cho J, Oh KJ, Jeon BC, Lee SG, Kim JH.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Oct 25; 57(11):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 31280239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Urinary sediment analyzed by flow cytometry.
    Yasui Y, Tatsumi N, Park K, Koezuka T.
    Cytometry; 1995 Mar 15; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 7587738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparison of the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® with manual microscopy for the detection of cells and 2 crystal types in canine and feline urine.
    Hernandez AM, Bilbrough GEA, DeNicola DB, Myrick C, Edwards S, Hammond JM, Myers AN, Heseltine JC, Russell K, Giraldi M, Nabity MB.
    J Vet Intern Med; 2019 Jan 15; 33(1):167-177. PubMed ID: 30511380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Evaluation of the performances of the UF-1000i(®) automated urine analyzer].
    Fabbro C, Darolles J, Rault JP.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011 Jan 15; 69(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 21896408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Assessment of FUS-200 Performance: Comparison with Quantitative Urine Culture Shows that Identifying the Right Cutoff for Optimizing Analyzer Performance Is Challenging.
    Gras JM, Henry N, Othmane M, Vranken GR.
    J Appl Lab Med; 2017 Jan 01; 1(4):365-375. PubMed ID: 33636803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Urine sediment analysis by the Yellow IRIS automated urinalysis workstation.
    Wargotz ES, Hyde JE, Karcher DS, Hitlan JP, Wilkinson DS.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Dec 01; 88(6):746-8. PubMed ID: 3687846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.