These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

550 related items for PubMed ID: 19864954

  • 1. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Feb; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of age on directional microphone hearing aid benefit and preference.
    Wu YH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 20166310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Benefits of adaptive FM systems on speech recognition in noise for listeners who use hearing aids.
    Thibodeau L.
    Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 20220201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM, Aspell E, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
    Summers V, Grant KW, Walden BE, Cord MT, Surr RK, Elhilali M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA, Picou EM.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings.
    Cord MT, Surr RK, Walden BE, Dittberner AB.
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.