These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study. Danuser H, Germann C, Pelzer N, Rühle A, Stucki P, Mattei A. BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 24472002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Atug F, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R. Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Jan; 60(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 16409421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a transatlantic comparison of techniques and outcomes. Chammas MF, Hubert J, Patel VR. BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1113-7. PubMed ID: 17437442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The retroperitoneal laparoscopic Hellström technique for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction from a crossing vessel. Zhang X, Xu K, Fu B, Zhang J, Lang B, Ai X, Wang B, Shi T, Ma X. BJU Int; 2007 Dec; 100(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 17850377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty. Srivastava A, Singh P, Maheshwari R, Ansari MS, Dubey D, Kapoor R, Kumar A, Mandhani A. Urol Int; 2009 Dec; 83(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 19996649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Desai MM, Desai MR, Gill IS. Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]