These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

491 related items for PubMed ID: 19875260

  • 1. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A, Crystal P, Scaranelo A, Helbich T.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
    The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography.
    Murakami R, Kumita S, Tani H, Yoshida T, Sugizaki K, Kuwako T, Kiriyama T, Hakozaki K, Okazaki E, Yanagihara K, Iida S, Haga S, Tsuchiya S.
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):768-73. PubMed ID: 23319110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY, Liu XJ, Zhai RY.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
    Wang X, Li L, Xu W, Liu W, Lederman D, Zheng B.
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
    Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Mohtashemi K, Jindal G, Disimio MP, Rogers SK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Im JG.
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ, Gilbert FJ, Wallis MG, Gillan MG, Astley SM, Boggis CR, Agbaje OF, Brentnall AR, Duffy SW.
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
    Malich A, Schmidt S, Fischer DR, Facius M, Kaiser WA.
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography for detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion.
    Scaranelo AM, Crystal P, Bukhanov K, Helbich TH.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2010 Jun; 61(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 20137883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG.
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J, Sahiner B, Hadjiiski LM, Chan HP, Wei J, Helvie MA, Zhou C.
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Morra L, Sacchetto D, Durando M, Agliozzo S, Carbonaro LA, Delsanto S, Pesce B, Persano D, Mariscotti G, Marra V, Fonio P, Bert A.
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Ge J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Wei J, Helvie MA, Zhou C, Chan HP.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb 21; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A, Lladó X, Freixenet J, Martí R, Pérez E, Pont J, Zwiggelaar R.
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul 21; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Cha JH, Kim H, Moon JH, Gong G, Ahn SH, Son BH.
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul 21; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.
    Zheng B, Wang X, Lederman D, Tan J, Gur D.
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov 21; 17(11):1401-8. PubMed ID: 20650667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.