These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

272 related items for PubMed ID: 1987716

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
    Lau CP, Wong CK, Leung WH, Liu WX.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of intrinsic versus paced ventricular function.
    Jutzy RV, Feenstra L, Pai R, Florio J, Bansal R, Aybar R, Levine PA.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1919-22. PubMed ID: 1279572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Lack of influence of atrioventricular delay on stroke volume at rest in patients with complete atrioventricular block and dual chamber pacing.
    Occhetta E, Piccinino C, Francalacci G, Magnani A, Bolognese L, Devecchi P, Rognoni G, Rossi P.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jul; 13(7):916-26. PubMed ID: 1695749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of intrinsic atrioventricular conduction and pacing rate.
    Iliev II, Yamachika S, Muta K, Hayano M, Ishimatsu T, Nakao K, Komiya N, Hirata T, Ueyama C, Yano K.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 23(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10666756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of ventricular function in atrial rate adaptive versus dual chamber rate adaptive pacing during exercise.
    Gallik DM, Guidry GW, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS, Spencer WH.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 7513403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
    Vardas PE, Simantirakis EN, Parthenakis FI, Chrysostomakis SI, Skalidis EI, Zuridakis EG.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
    Ovsyshcher I, Zimlichman R, Katz A, Bondy C, Furman S.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar 01; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mechanism of hemodynamic improvement by dual-chamber pacing for severe left ventricular dysfunction: an acute Doppler and catheterization hemodynamic study.
    Nishimura RA, Hayes DL, Holmes DR, Tajik AJ.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Feb 01; 25(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 7829778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output in patients with physiologic pacemakers. Effects of left ventricular function and retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction.
    Stewart WJ, Dicola VC, Harthorne JW, Gillam LD, Weyman AE.
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Aug 01; 54(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 6465010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hemodynamic benefit of atrioventricular synchrony: prediction from baseline Doppler-echocardiographic variables.
    Pearson AC, Janosik DL, Redd RM, Buckingham TA, Labovitz AJ.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jun 01; 13(7):1613-21. PubMed ID: 2723274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Doppler index and plasma level of atrial natriuretic hormone are improved by optimizing atrioventricular delay in atrioventricular block patients with implanted DDD pacemakers.
    Toda N, Ishikawa T, Nozawa N, Kobayashi I, Ochiai H, Miyamoto K, Sumita S, Kimura K, Umemura S.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov 01; 24(11):1660-3. PubMed ID: 11816636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. What's the price to be paid for rate response: AV sequential versus ventricular pacing?
    Markewitz A, Hemmer W.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov 01; 14(11 Pt 2):1782-6. PubMed ID: 1721175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Preimplantation echo Doppler evaluation of VVI versus DDD pacing.
    Soussou AI, Helmy MG, Guindy RR.
    Echocardiography; 1995 Jul 01; 12(4):335-49. PubMed ID: 10150780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of different AV delays on left ventricular diastolic function and ANF levels in DDD paced hypertensive patients during daily activity and exercise.
    Panou FK, Kafkas NV, Michelakakis NA, Matsakas EP, Dounis GB, Kouvousis NM, Perpinia AS, Zacharoulis AA.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr 01; 22(4 Pt 1):635-42. PubMed ID: 10234717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.