These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 19885420

  • 21. An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination.
    Bassir L, Khanehmasjedi M, Nasr E, Kaviani A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 23649068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of different surface pre-treatment methods on the microleakage of two different self-adhesive composites in Class V cavities.
    Celik EU, Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25793951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self-etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
    Fakhri M, Seraj B, Shahrabi M, Motahhary P, Hooshmand T.
    Pediatr Dent; 2009 Mar; 31(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 19722444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four-year water storage in vitro.
    Cehreli ZC, Gungor HC.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 19058684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The effect of different surface treatments of demineralised enamel on microleakage under metal orthodontic brackets.
    Moosavi H, Ahrari F, Mohamadipour H.
    Prog Orthod; 2013 May 20; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 24325863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun 20; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
    Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jun 20; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun 20; 32(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 19793779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araújo CT, Paulillo LA.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Jun 20; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of lingual retainer wires bonded with three different lingual retainer composites: an in vitro study.
    Nimbalkar-Patil S, Vaz A, Patil PG.
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov 20; 8(11):ZC83-7. PubMed ID: 25584325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD, Uçtasli MB, Eligüzeloglu E, Ozcan S, Omürlü H.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Nov 20; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. In vitro evaluation of microleakage under ceramic and metal brackets bonded with LED and plasma arc curing.
    Davari A, Yassaei S, Karandish M, Zarghami F.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep 01; 13(5):644-9. PubMed ID: 23250168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB, Arhun N, Celik C.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Sep 01; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.