These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

622 related items for PubMed ID: 19885424

  • 1. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y, Ioi H, Uehara M, Hara A, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL.
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Camporesi M.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frictional resistance in plastic preadjusted brackets ligated with low-friction and conventional elastomeric ligatures.
    Ioi H, Yanase Y, Uehara M, Hara A, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL.
    J Orthod; 2009 Mar; 36(1):17-22; discussion 13. PubMed ID: 19286872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Forces released by nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of buccally displaced teeth.
    Franchi L, Baccetti T, Camporesi M, Giuntini V.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):316.e1-6; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 19732660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV, Padmanabhan R, Janardhanam P.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Sep; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
    Thomas S, Sherriff M, Birnie D.
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Friction: self-ligating brackets].
    Thermac G, Morgon L, Godeneche J.
    Orthod Fr; 2008 Dec; 79(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 19061628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S, Festa F, Caputi S, Traini T, Di Iorio D, D'Attilio M.
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
    Reicheneder CA, Gedrange T, Berrisch S, Proff P, Baumert U, Faltermeier A, Muessig D.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
    Monteiro MR, Silva LE, Elias CN, Vilella Ode V.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA, Keilig L, El-Bialy T, Reimann S, Jäger A, Bourauel C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.
    Leite VV, Lopes MB, Gonini Júnior A, Almeida MR, Moura SK, Almeida RR.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R, Kwon HK, Close JM.
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K, Sandbhor S, Rajasekaran UB, Sam G, Ramees MM, Abraham EA.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug 01; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH.
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov 01; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S, Marzo G, Di Bisceglie B, Crincoli V, Tetè S, Festa F.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 Nov 01; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of sliding velocity on friction: an in vitro study at extremely low sliding velocity approximating orthodontic tooth movement.
    Yanase Y, Ioi H, Nishioka M, Takahashi I.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May 01; 84(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 24160997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.