These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

93 related items for PubMed ID: 19889852

  • 1. Bottom-up driven involuntary auditory evoked field change: constant sound sequencing amplifies but does not sharpen neural activity.
    Okamoto H, Stracke H, Lagemann L, Pantev C.
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 103(1):244-9. PubMed ID: 19889852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sound processing hierarchy within human auditory cortex.
    Okamoto H, Stracke H, Bermudez P, Pantev C.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1855-63. PubMed ID: 20521859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Neural interactions within and beyond the critical band elicited by two simultaneously presented narrow band noises: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Okamoto H, Stracke H, Pantev C.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Feb 06; 151(3):913-20. PubMed ID: 18191899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Frequency-specific modulation of population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex.
    Okamoto H, Stracke H, Zwitserlood P, Roberts LE, Pantev C.
    BMC Neurosci; 2009 Jan 06; 10():1. PubMed ID: 19126204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of amplitude modulation of background noise on auditory-evoked magnetic fields.
    Hiraumi H, Nagamine T, Morita T, Naito Y, Fukuyama H, Ito J.
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov 06; 1239():191-7. PubMed ID: 18778694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise.
    Okamoto H, Kakigi R, Gunji A, Kubo T, Pantev C.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr 06; 21(7):1957-61. PubMed ID: 15869488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M, Kruck S, De Baene W, Schröger E, Alter K, Friederici AD.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct 06; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V, May P, Tiitinen H.
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb 06; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory N1 component to gaps in continuous narrowband noises.
    Atcherson SR, Gould HJ, Mendel MI, Ethington CA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec 06; 30(6):687-95. PubMed ID: 19675460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I, Mathiak K, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H.
    Neuropsychologia; 2004 Dec 06; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Practice strategies of musicians modulate neural processing and the learning of sound-patterns.
    Seppänen M, Brattico E, Tervaniemi M.
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2007 Feb 06; 87(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 17046293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.