These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 19892291

  • 21. Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.
    Chen Y, Kang ST, Bae SM, Kyung HM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19651357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery.
    Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):630-4. PubMed ID: 22413853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Fabrication and clinical use of surgical template for placement of orthodontic micro-implants in interradicular space].
    Huang JN, Wu JC, Xu XJ, Zhang JC, Xie ZJ.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 40(3):257-8. PubMed ID: 15938898
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses of the osseointegration of microscrews with different surgical techniques in beagle dogs.
    Wu X, Deng F, Wang Z, Zhao Z, Wang J.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 18656397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Impact of implant design on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Wilmes B, Ottenstreuer S, Su YY, Drescher D.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 18213460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis.
    Zhao L, Xu Z, Yang Z, Wei X, Tang T, Zhao Z.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 19615659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Temporary orthodontic anchorage devices for improving occlusion.
    Rossouw PE, Buschang PH.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Aug; 12(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 19627521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A modified dental implant surgical template for the prevention of flap interference in a completely edentulous maxilla.
    Hariharan R, Rajan M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):410-1. PubMed ID: 18992577
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment.
    Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 19651354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Virtually fabricated guide for placement of the C-tube miniplate.
    Paek J, Jeong DM, Kim Y, Kim SH, Chung KR, Nelson G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 24785934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery.
    Sohmura T, Kusumoto N, Otani T, Yamada S, Wakabayashi K, Yatani H.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19126112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics.
    Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Hohoff A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 18774090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Fabrication of an adjustable mini-screw surgical guide.
    Pithon MM, dos Santos RL.
    J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 37(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 20567035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Surgical guide for optimal positioning of mini-implants.
    Morea C, Dominguez GC, Wuo Ado V, Tortamano A.
    J Clin Orthod; 2005 May; 39(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 15961891
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparison between implants inserted with and without computer planning and custom model coordination.
    Danza M, Zollino I, Carinci F.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19521258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Numerical/experimental analysis of the stress field around miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage.
    Gracco A, Cirignaco A, Cozzani M, Boccaccio A, Pappalettere C, Vitale G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 19088058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Accuracy study of computer-assisted drilling: the effect of bone density, drill bit characteristics, and use of a mechanical guide.
    Hüfner T, Geerling J, Oldag G, Richter M, Kfuri M, Pohlemann T, Krettek C.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Feb; 19(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 15891540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B, Arman A, Uçkan S, Yazici AC.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Accuracy of surgical positioning of orthodontic miniscrews with a computer-aided design and manufacturing template.
    Liu H, Liu DX, Wang G, Wang CL, Zhao Z.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):728.e1-728.e10; discussion 728-9. PubMed ID: 20685519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.