These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

349 related items for PubMed ID: 19895858

  • 1. FRN and P300 ERP effect modulation in response to feedback sensitivity: the contribution of punishment-reward system (BIS/BAS) and behaviour identification of action.
    Balconi M, Crivelli D.
    Neurosci Res; 2010 Feb; 66(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 19895858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Veridical and false feedback sensitivity and punishment-reward system (BIS/BAS): ERP amplitude and theta frequency band analysis.
    Balconi M, Crivelli D.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1502-1510. PubMed ID: 20381417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V, Varriale V, D'Antuono L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C, Polezzi D, Daum I.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W, Severo MC, Moors A, Pourtois G.
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM, Alexopoulos J, Bauer H, Sailer U.
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Behavioral approach and reward processing: results on feedback-related negativity and P3 component.
    Lange S, Leue A, Beauducel A.
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):416-25. PubMed ID: 22178442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Error monitoring functions in response to an external feedback when an explicit judgement is required: ERP modulation and cortical source localisation.
    Balconi M, Scioli S.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 22119662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Baseline EEG theta/beta ratio and punishment sensitivity as biomarkers for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and risk-taking.
    Massar SA, Rossi V, Schutter DJ, Kenemans JL.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 123(10):1958-65. PubMed ID: 22542439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.
    Bellebaum C, Daum I.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 27(7):1823-35. PubMed ID: 18380674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitivity to punishment and reward omission: evidence from error-related ERP components.
    Boksem MA, Tops M, Kostermans E, De Cremer D.
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 18571302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation.
    Zhou Z, Yu R, Zhou X.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3606-13. PubMed ID: 20727905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of interpersonal competition on monitoring internal and external error feedback.
    Van Meel CS, Van Heijningen CA.
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar 01; 47(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 20074085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning.
    Kobza S, Thoma P, Daum I, Bellebaum C.
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Dec 01; 225(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 21846482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study.
    Wischnewski M, Schutter DJLG.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr 01; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Can event-related potentials serve as neural markers for wins, losses, and near-wins in a gambling task? A principal components analysis.
    Lole L, Gonsalvez CJ, Barry RJ, De Blasio FM.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep 01; 89(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 23792216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.