These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

231 related items for PubMed ID: 19899575

  • 1. [Influence of 3.0 mm incision coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery (MICS) on corneal thickness].
    Wylegała E, Rebkowska-Juraszek M, Dobrowolski D, Woyna-Orlewicz A.
    Klin Oczna; 2009; 111(7-9):207-11. PubMed ID: 19899575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Piotr L, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Elkady B, Piñero D, Alió JL.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 19251139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G, Amon M, Franz C, Prinz A, Abela-Formanek C.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors influencing corneal biomechanical changes after microincision cataract surgery and standard coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió JL, Agdeppa MC, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Amparo F, Piñero DP.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):890-7. PubMed ID: 20494758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative clinical trial of ultrasound phacoemulsification with and without the WhiteStar system.
    Fishkind W, Bakewell B, Donnenfeld ED, Rose AD, Watkins LA, Olson RJ.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 16516777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
    Crema AS, Walsh A, Yamane Y, Nosé W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Park J, Yum HR, Kim MS, Harrison AR, Kim EC.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 19185236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    Klin Oczna; 2011 Feb; 113(10-12):314-20. PubMed ID: 22384647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Clinical evaluation on the coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery].
    Yao K, Wang W, Wu W, Tang XJ, Li ZC, Jin CF.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 47(10):903-7. PubMed ID: 22321500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Feasibility of bimanual microincision phacoemulsification in hard cataracts.
    Assaf A, El-Moatassem Kotb AM.
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun; 21(6):807-11. PubMed ID: 16680107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: Microincision versus standard technique.
    Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Virgili G, Giansanti F, Menchini U.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 16863974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Corneal wound architecture and integrity after phacoemulsification evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques.
    Berdahl JP, DeStafeno JJ, Kim T.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):510-5. PubMed ID: 17321403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study.
    Can I, Takmaz T, Yildiz Y, Bayhan HA, Soyugelen G, Bostanci B.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 20457364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.