These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
357 related items for PubMed ID: 19914926
1. Twenty-six-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley standard profile pericardial aortic valve. Honda K, Okamura Y, Nishimura Y, Uchita S. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):315-6. PubMed ID: 19914926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stented within a stentless aortic valve. A simple surgical solution for the replacement of a stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Panagiotou M, Kogerakis N, Crockett JR, Economidou S. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 19805504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Unusual 25-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Fiore A, Cooley DA, Grande AM, Viganò M, Angelini P. Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Apr; 91(4):e52-3. PubMed ID: 21440107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of pannus in the longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Butany JW, Kesarwani R, Yau TM, Singh G, Thangaroopan M, Nair V, Leong SW. J Card Surg; 2006 Apr; 21(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 16948773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprosthesis in patients younger than 60 years. Yankah CA. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 140(5):e83-4. PubMed ID: 20708752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The pericardial valve in the aortic position ten years later. Gonzalez-Lavin L, Gonzalez-Lavin J, Chi S, Lewis B, Amini S, Graf D. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 1986172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses. Reece IJ, Fisher J, Sethia B, MacArthur KJ, Wheatley DJ. Z Kardiol; 1986 Jan; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Wu Y, Wang L, Starr A. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpreting a 20-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Suyker WJ, Leicher FG. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 May; 139(5):1354-5. PubMed ID: 20412969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term outcome of the MitroFlow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly after aortic valve replacement. Sjögren J, Gudbjartsson T, Thulin LI. J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 16607900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless pericardial xenografts: a propensity-matched analysis. D'Onofrio A, Cresce GD, Bolgan I, Magagna P, Piccin C, Auriemma S, Fabbri A. J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May 21; 20(3):319-25; discussion 326. PubMed ID: 21714424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconstruction of atrioventricular valves with photo-oxidized bovine pericardium. Verbrugghe P, Meuris B, Flameng W, Herijgers P. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Nov 21; 9(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 19684031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Unexpected long durability of a low-profile porcine Liotta bioprosthesis in mitral position. Campanella A, Comoglio C, Sansone F, Rinaldi M. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2009 Jun 21; 10(6):492-3. PubMed ID: 19346969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]