These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

612 related items for PubMed ID: 1992318

  • 1. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, Miller HC.
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb 28; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Magni A, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul 28; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
    Martinell J, Fraile J, Artiz V, Moreno J, Rábago G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov 28; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Kitchin AH, Wheatley DJ, Walbaum PR, Lutz W, Miller HC.
    Circulation; 1986 Jun 28; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, DeSmet JM, Danielson GK, Pluth JR, Puga FJ.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb 28; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
    Sethia B, Turner MA, Lewis S, Rodger RA, Bain WH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar 28; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
    Borkon AM, Soule LM, Baughman KL, Aoun H, Baumgartner WA, Gardner TJ, Watkins L, Gott VL, Reitz BA.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul 28; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
    Joyce LD, Nelson RM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul 28; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov 28; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of porcine biological valves with pericardial valves--a 12-year clinical experience with 1123 bio-prostheses.
    Reichenspurner H, Weinhold C, Nollert G, Kaulbach HG, Vetter HO, Boehm DH, Reichart B.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Feb 28; 43(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7540324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J, Yu W, Silver MD, David TE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan 28; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.