These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

798 related items for PubMed ID: 19927100

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
    Zigler JE, Glenn J, Delamarter RB.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK, Sengupta DK, Knaub MA, Wiater BP, Abjornson C, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan 01; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q, Itshayek E, Jones CF, Schwab T, Larson CR, Lenke LG, Cripton PA.
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun 01; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL.
    Spine J; 2009 May 01; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
    Cakir B, Carazzo C, Schmidt R, Mattes T, Reichel H, Käfer W.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 20; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy.
    Auerbach JD, Wills BP, McIntosh TC, Balderston RA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar 01; 32(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 17334286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R, Zigler JE, Balderston RA, Cammisa FP, Goldstein JA, Spivak JM.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr 20; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Distribution of in vivo and in vitro range of motion following 1-level arthroplasty with the CHARITE artificial disc compared with fusion.
    Cunningham BW, McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, Cappuccino A, Regan JJ, Fedder IL, Tortolani PJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Jan 20; 8(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18173340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.