These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
554 related items for PubMed ID: 19932706
21. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames. Wilson KD, Woldorff MG, Mangun GR. Neuroimage; 2005 Apr 15; 25(3):668-83. PubMed ID: 15808968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: an event-related fMRI study. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. Neuroimage; 2001 Dec 15; 14(6):1256-67. PubMed ID: 11707082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space. Arrington CM, Carr TH, Mayer AR, Rao SM. J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Dec 15; 12 Suppl 2():106-17. PubMed ID: 11506651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience. Geng JJ, Mangun GR. J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug 15; 21(8):1584-601. PubMed ID: 18752405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Effective connectivity during feature-based attentional capture: evidence against the attentional reorienting hypothesis of TPJ. DiQuattro NE, Sawaki R, Geng JJ. Cereb Cortex; 2014 Dec 15; 24(12):3131-41. PubMed ID: 23825319 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Visuospatial reorienting signals in the human temporo-parietal junction are independent of response selection. Astafiev SV, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jan 15; 23(2):591-6. PubMed ID: 16420468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space. Neggers SF, Van der Lubbe RH, Ramsey NF, Postma A. Neuroimage; 2006 May 15; 31(1):320-31. PubMed ID: 16473025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: an fMRI study. van der Ham IJ, Raemaekers M, van Wezel RJ, Oleksiak A, Postma A. Brain Res; 2009 Nov 10; 1297():70-9. PubMed ID: 19651111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: an fMRI study. Zago L, Petit L, Turbelin MR, Andersson F, Vigneau M, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Neuropsychologia; 2008 May 10; 46(9):2403-14. PubMed ID: 18406434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study. Hietanen JK, Nummenmaa L, Nyman MJ, Parkkola R, Hämäläinen H. Neuroimage; 2006 Oct 15; 33(1):406-13. PubMed ID: 16949306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Perceptual grouping in the human brain: common processing of different cues. Seymour K, Karnath HO, Himmelbach M. Neuroreport; 2008 Dec 03; 19(18):1769-72. PubMed ID: 18955906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Orienting attention to locations in perceptual versus mental representations. Nobre AC, Coull JT, Maquet P, Frith CD, Vandenberghe R, Mesulam MM. J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr 03; 16(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 15072672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks. Donner TH, Kettermann A, Diesch E, Ostendorf F, Villringer A, Brandt SA. Neuroimage; 2002 Jan 03; 15(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 11771970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability. Giessing C, Thiel CM, Rösler F, Fink GR. Neuroscience; 2006 Feb 03; 137(3):853-64. PubMed ID: 16309846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]