These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


318 related items for PubMed ID: 19933027

  • 1. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants.
    Oba AA, Dülgergil T, Sönmez IS, Doğan S.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
    Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH.
    Caries Res; 2006 Nov; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
    Chen X, Du MQ, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE.
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results.
    Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu D.
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):764-70. PubMed ID: 23831419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.
    Ulusu T, Odabaş ME, Tüzüner T, Baygin O, Sillelioğlu H, Deveci C, Gökdoğan FG, Altuntaş A.
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.
    Cabral RN, Faber J, Otero SAM, Hilgert LA, Leal SC.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Do light cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants perform better than resin-composite sealants: a 4-year randomized clinical trial.
    Zhang W, Chen X, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE.
    Dent Mater; 2014 May; 30(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 24602520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Petrauskienė S, Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K, Narbutaitė J.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May 01; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial.
    Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppä L.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb 01; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The state-of-the-art of ART sealants.
    Frencken JE.
    Dent Update; 2014 Mar 01; 41(2):119-20, 122-4. PubMed ID: 24783880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].
    Liu YJ, Chang Q, Rong WS, Zhao XL.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul 09; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing the caries-preventive effect of two fissure sealing modalities in public health care: a single application of glass ionomer and a routine resin-based sealant programme. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
    Kervanto-Seppälä S, Lavonius E, Pietilä I, Pitkäniemi J, Meurman JH, Kerosuo E.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Jan 09; 18(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18086027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria.
    Hilgert LA, Leal SC, Freire GML, Mulder J, Frencken JE.
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 May 04; 31():e35. PubMed ID: 28513786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A 3-year clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants.
    Pereira AC, Pardi V, Mialhe FL, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb 04; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12744408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Heat-treated glass ionomer cement fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow-up.
    Skrinjaric K, Vranic DN, Glavina D, Skrinjaric I.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep 04; 18(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 18298543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial.
    Baseggio W, Naufel FS, Davidoff DC, Nahsan FP, Flury S, Rodrigues JA.
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2010 Sep 04; 8(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 20848004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.
    Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V.
    PLoS One; 2016 Sep 04; 11(1):e0146512. PubMed ID: 26799812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, Yazici AR, Hardigan PC, Alempour S, Evans D, Ocanto R.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb 04; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Treating High-Caries Risk Occlusal Surfaces in First Permanent Molars through Sealants and Supervised Toothbrushing: A 3-Year Cost-Effective Analysis.
    Goldman A, Leal SC, de Amorim RG, Frencken JE.
    Caries Res; 2017 Feb 04; 51(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 28954261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Retention and caries preventive effects of a GIC and a resin-based fissure sealant.
    Arrow P, Riordan PJ.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Oct 04; 23(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 8529341
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.