These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Assessment of Tubal Patency: A Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation. Ott J, Hager M, Nouri K, Marschalek J, Kurz C. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 30880158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, Kleiman-Broeze KA, Traas MAF, Muijsers GJJM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, van Oostwaard MF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Peters HE, Lier MCI, Lambalk CB, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Stoker J, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V. BMC Womens Health; 2018 May 09; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating Fallopian Tube Patency: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Grigovich M, Kacharia VS, Bharwani N, Hemingway A, Mijatovic V, Rodgers SK. Radiographics; 2021 Oct 09; 41(6):1876-18961. PubMed ID: 34597232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media. Kahyaoglu S, Yumusak OH, Kahyaoglu I, Kucukbas GN, Esercan A, Tasci Y. J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May 09; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of a new gel foam for the evaluation of tubal patency. Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D. Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 May 09; 75(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 23296258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical use of sonohysterography in the evaluation of infertility. Case AM, Pierson RA. J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 Aug 09; 25(8):641-8. PubMed ID: 12908016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The significance of laparoscopy in determining the optimal management plan for infertile patients with suspected tubal pathology revealed by hysterosalpingography. Tsuji I, Ami K, Fujinami N, Hoshiai H. Tohoku J Exp Med; 2012 Jun 09; 227(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 22687706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Infertility work-up: To what degree does laparoscopy change the management strategy based on hysterosalpingography findings? Berker B, Şükür YE, Aytaç R, Atabekoğlu CS, Sönmezer M, Özmen B. J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov 09; 41(11):1785-90. PubMed ID: 26399775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Sonohysterosalpingography: Comparison of foam and saline solution. Piccioni MG, Riganelli L, Filippi V, Fuggetta E, Colagiovanni V, Imperiale L, Caccetta J, Panici PB, Porpora MG. J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Feb 09; 45(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 27753111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of color Doppler mapping for tubal patency. Demir B, Kocak M, Beydilli G, Kaplan M, Gelisen O, Haberal A. J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul 09; 37(7):782-6. PubMed ID: 21395904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial. Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V. Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep 09; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy for tubal patency in infertile women. Foroozanfard F, Sadat Z. Nurs Midwifery Stud; 2013 Jun 09; 2(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 25414857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Are patient characteristics associated with the accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal pathology? An individual patient data meta-analysis. Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Van Geloven N, Coppus SF, Collins JA, Den Hartog JE, Van der Linden PJ, Marianowski P, Ng EH, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Strandell A, Van der Veen F, Mol BW. Hum Reprod Update; 2011 Jun 09; 17(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 21147835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Fallopian tube catheterization and recanalization under ultrasonic observation: a simplified technique to evaluate tubal patency and open proximally obstructed tubes. Lisse K, Sydow P. Fertil Steril; 1991 Aug 09; 56(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 1830006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization. Bloechle M, Schreiner T, Gouma E, Lisse K. Hum Reprod; 1996 Jul 09; 11(7):1423-6. PubMed ID: 8671479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Assessment Methods for Fallopian Tubal Patency and Peritubal Adhesion Between Transvaginal 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation. He Y, Ma X, Xu J, Li S, Wu H, Liu Q, Kong L, Luo J, Liu H. J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar 09; 36(3):547-556. PubMed ID: 28151551 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of Tubal Patency Assessment in Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Compared with Laparoscopy in Infertile Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Promberger R, Simek IM, Nouri K, Obermaier K, Kurz C, Ott J. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Mar 09; 25(5):794-799. PubMed ID: 29221993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Power Doppler flow mapping and four-dimensional ultrasound for evaluating tubal patency compared with laparoscopy. Soliman AA, Shaalan W, Abdel-Dayem T, Awad EE, Elkassar Y, Lüdders D, Malik E, Sallam HN. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec 09; 195():83-87. PubMed ID: 26479436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]