These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 19942122

  • 1. Enabling technology for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Vassiliades T.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009; 21(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 19942122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Subramanian VA, Loulmet DF, Patel NC.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007; 19(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 18395626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Current state of integrated "hybrid" coronary revascularization.
    DeRose JJ.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009; 21(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 19942121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Robotic mammary artery harvest and anastomotic device allows minimally invasive mitral valve repair and coronary bypass.
    Guy TS, Brzezinski M, Stechert MM, Tseng E.
    J Card Surg; 2009; 24(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 18778296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hybrid coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Bainbridge D, Dobkowski W.
    Anesthesiol Clin; 2008 Sep; 26(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 18765217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Hybrid coronary revascularization: a review.
    Narasimhan S, Srinivas VS, DeRose JJ.
    Cardiol Rev; 2011 Sep; 19(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 21464637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: technical considerations.
    Reddy RC.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 23(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 22172359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anastomotic devices for coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Falk V, Walther T, Gummert JF.
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2005 Mar; 2(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 16293059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Anastomotic devices for coronary artery bypass grafting: technological options and potential pitfalls.
    Gummert JF, Opfermann U, Jacobs S, Walther T, Kempfert J, Mohr FW, Falk V.
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1384-93. PubMed ID: 17240365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Calafiore AM, Angelini GD, Bergsland J, Salerno TA.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1545-8. PubMed ID: 8893612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Multivessel minimally invasive coronary surgery with endoscopic support.
    Vlassov GP, Ermolov AS, Deyneka KS, Travine NO, Belinskiy MB, Klimovskiy SD, Zhuravlev IV.
    Heart Surg Forum; 1999 Nov; 2(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 11276492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Robotically enhanced totally endoscopic right internal thoracic coronary artery bypass to the right coronary artery.
    Aybek T, Dogan S, Andressen E, Mierdl S, Westphal K, Moritz A, Wimmer-Greinecker G.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2000 Nov; 3(4):322-4. PubMed ID: 11178295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Hybrid coronary revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents.
    Murphy GJ, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 78(5):1861-7. PubMed ID: 15511503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Combined transapical aortic valve replacement and minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting--a new concept for selected high-risk patients.
    Mellert F, Breuer J, Probst C, Welz A, Schiller W.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2011 Feb; 14(1):E61-3. PubMed ID: 21345778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hybrid revascularization strategy: a pilot study on the association of robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fractional-flow-reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Davidavicius G, Van Praet F, Mansour S, Casselman F, Bartunek J, Degrieck I, Wellens F, De Geest R, Vanermen H, Wijns W, De Bruyne B.
    Circulation; 2005 Aug 30; 112(9 Suppl):I317-22. PubMed ID: 16159838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intra- and postoperative quality control in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery.
    Carrel T, Berdat P, Walpoth B, Kipfer B, Hess OM, Neidhart P, Robe J, Sieber T, Althaus U.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Jun 26; 129(25):951-6. PubMed ID: 10422190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hybrid coronary revascularization by endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting on beating heart and stent placement.
    Gao C, Yang M, Wu Y, Wang G, Xiao C, Liu H, Lu C.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar 26; 87(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 19231382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Robotic-enhanced Dresden technique for minimally invasive bilateral internal mammary artery grafting.
    Kappert U, Cichon R, Gulielmos V, Schneider J, Schramm I, Nicolai J, Tugtekin SM, Schueler S.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2000 Mar 26; 3(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 11178294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Poor left ventricular function is not a contraindication for robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Rehman A, Garcia J, Deshpande S, Fitzpatrick M, Odonkor P, Zimrin D, Griffith B, Bonatti J.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Jun 26; 12(3):E152-4. PubMed ID: 19546067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients.
    Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Gummert JF, Bucerius J, Jacobs S, Autschbach R.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 May 26; 121(5):842-53. PubMed ID: 11326227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.