These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
174 related items for PubMed ID: 1994410
1. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging. Schaefer CM, Greene R, Llewellyn HJ, Mrose HE, Pile-Spellman EA, Rubens JR, Lindemann SR. Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mediastinal abnormalities: detection with storage phosphor digital radiography. Schaefer CM, Greene R, Hall DA, Lindemann SR, Llewellyn HJ, McCarthy KA, Pile-Spellman ER, Rubens JR. Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 1984298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic]. Dölken W, Chowanetz W, Horwitz AE, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Lackner K. Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of bullous lung disease: conventional radiography vs digital storage phosphor radiography. Buckley KM, Schaefer CM, Greene R, Agatston S, Fay J, Llewellyn HJ, Mrose HE, Rubens JR. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):467-70. PubMed ID: 1899739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study. Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T. J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography. Oestmann JW, Greene R, Rubens JR, Pile-Spellman E, Hall D, Robertson C, Llewellyn HJ, McCarthy KA, Potsaid M, White G. Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions. Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M. Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital luminescence radiography in interstitial lung disease. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Andrésdóttir A, Brådvik I, Hochbergs P, Lárusdóttir H, Lundin A. Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 2012723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom. Mosser H, Pärtan G, Urban M, Krampla W, Ottes F, Hruby W. Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of radiographic findings in lung fibrosis using storage phosphor plates. Müller RD, Herting D, Hirche H, John V, Buddenbrock B, Gocke P, Wiebringhaus R, Konietzko N, Langer R. Eur Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 9204345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects. Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S. Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: preliminary experience with experimentally created defects. Ludwig K, Link TM, Fiebich M, Renger B, Diederich S, Oelerich M, Lenzen H, Heindel W. Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):220-4. PubMed ID: 10887251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of varying filter kernel sizes on the image quality of interstitial lung diseases. Müller RD, Herting D, Hirche H, John V, Buddenbrock B, Gocke P, Wiebringhaus R, Braunschweig R, Voss M, Mohnke M, Konietzko N. Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):732-40. PubMed ID: 8915285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of postprocessing on the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules with digital radiography. Oestmann JW, Rubens JR, Bourgouin PM, Rhea JT, Llewellyn HJ, Greene R. Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 2521129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease. Schaefer CM, Greene R, Oestmann JW, Hall DA, Llewellyn HJ, McCarthy KA, Pile-Spellman ER, Rubens JR. Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems. Ludwig K, Schülke C, Diederich S, Wormanns D, Lenzen H, Bernhardt TM, Brinckmann P, Heindel W. Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 12615999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease. van Schelven IH, Winter LH, Chakraborty DP, Schultze Kool LJ. Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis. Müller RD, Voss M, Hirche H, Buddenbrock B, John V, Bosch E. Eur Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]