These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
282 related items for PubMed ID: 1994638
1. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling. Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M. Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix. Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG. Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling. Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Singer A. Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ. Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy. Hoffman MS, Gordy LW, Cavanagh D. Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions. Selvaggi SM. J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells. Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P. Acta Cytol; 1989 Sep; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling. Stock RJ, Thurmond AI, Passmore A. Acta Cytol; 1988 Sep; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG. Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic. Smith-Levitin M, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P. J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton. Schettino F, Sideri M, Cangini L, Candiani M, Zannoni E, Maggi R, Ferrari A. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]