These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

346 related items for PubMed ID: 19947508

  • 1. [An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].
    Guan T, Zhu Z, Ye D.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1146-9. PubMed ID: 19947508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.
    von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Adunka OF.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011 Aug; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A, Schüssler M, Battmer RD, Stöver T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Aug; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS).
    Wilson BS.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():56-66. PubMed ID: 21756584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Chronic Electro-Acoustic Stimulation May Interfere With Electric Threshold Recovery After Cochlear Implantation in the Aged Guinea Pig.
    Reiss LAJ, Lawrence MB, Omelchenko IA, He W, Kirk JR.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 45(6):1554-1567. PubMed ID: 38992863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J, Neumann S, Schafer E, Marsh M, Wood M, Baker RS.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet?
    Adunka OF, Pillsbury HC, Adunka MC, Buchman CA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1049-54. PubMed ID: 20351607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.