These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

420 related items for PubMed ID: 19951021

  • 1. Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.
    Ahn PG, Kim KN, Moon SW, Kim KS.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 19951021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].
    Lou J, Liu H, Rong X, Gong Q, Song Y, Li T.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 29(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 26455172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
    Park JJ, Quirno M, Cunningham MR, Schwarzkopf R, Bendo JA, Spivak JM, Goldstein JA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr 15; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C.
    Rabin D, Bertagnoli R, Wharton N, Pickett GE, Duggal N.
    Spine J; 2009 Feb 15; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 18619913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul 15; 7(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17633486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.
    Shin DA, Yi S, Yoon DH, Kim KN, Shin HC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 15; 34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 19444062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC, Best NM.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb 15; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preoperative T1 Slope as a Predictor of Change in Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.
    Zhao J, Jiang R, Yang Y, Gu R, Gao Z, Xiao J, Chen S, Yang M.
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Dec 09; 23():5844-5850. PubMed ID: 29222937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Kim SW, Paik SH, Castro PA, Baek SW, Shin DJ, Kwak YH, Ju YS.
    Spine J; 2010 Aug 09; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Can segmental mobility be increased by cervical arthroplasty?
    Chang HK, Chang CC, Tu TH, Wu JC, Huang WC, Fay LY, Chang PY, Wu CL, Cheng H.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb 09; 42(2):E3. PubMed ID: 28142280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.
    Auerbach JD, Anakwenze OA, Milby AH, Lonner BS, Balderston RA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec 01; 36(25):E1593-9. PubMed ID: 21508886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Kang KC, Lee CS, Han JH, Chung SS.
    Spine J; 2010 Aug 01; 10(8):689-96. PubMed ID: 20547108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.
    Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC.
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Jan 01; 17(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17721713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
    Lazaro BC, Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Kowalczyk I, Rabin D, Fink M, Duggal N.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun 01; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar 01; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC.
    Spine J; 2007 Mar 01; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion.
    Rajakumar DV, Hari A, Krishna M, Konar S, Sharma A.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb 01; 42(2):E5. PubMed ID: 28142281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.