These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


153 related items for PubMed ID: 1995176

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Variability in estimation of coronary dimensions from 6F and 8F catheters.
    Legrand V, Raskinet B, Martinez C, Kulbertus H.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):39-45; discussion 46. PubMed ID: 8770477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of catheters and metallic catheter markers as calibration standard for measurement of coronary dimension.
    Leung WH, Demopulos PA, Alderman EL, Sanders W, Stadius ML.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Nov; 21(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 2225049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Coronary artery injection technique: a quantitative in vivo investigation using modern catheters.
    Dodge JT, Nykiel M, Altmann J, Hobkirk K, Brennan M, Gibson CM.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 May; 44(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9600520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A prospective randomized study of 4.1 French catheters utilizing the percutaneous right brachial approach for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Talley JD, Smith SM, Walton-Shirley M, Hattel L, Szabo T, Godlewski K, Stahr L, Yussman Z, Palmer S, Vogel R.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 May; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 1499063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters).
    Ito S, Kinoshita K, Endo A, Nakamura M, Muramatsu T.
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1752-1757. PubMed ID: 26849831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Coronary angiography using 4 French catheters with power injection: a randomized comparison with 6 French catheters.
    Arora P, Naik N, Bahl VK, Mishra S, Yadav R, Sharma S, Manchanda SC.
    Indian Heart J; 2002 Nov; 54(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 12086383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Koning G, Hekking E, Kemppainen JS, Richardson GA, Rothman MT, Reiber JH.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 11246248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomised comparison of the use of 4 and 6 French diagnostic catheters: the limits of downsizing.
    Danzi GB, Capuano C, Sesana M, Di Blasi A, Predolini S, Laterza C, Quaini E.
    Int J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 79(2-3):113-7; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 11461729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.