These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
167 related items for PubMed ID: 19953772
1. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled fissure sealant placed with different adhesive systems: 24-month results. Yazici AR, Karaman E, Baseren M, Tuncer D, Yazici E, Unlüer S. Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19953772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A 48-month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed with different adhesive systems. Karaman E, Yazici AR, Tuncer D, Firat E, Unluer S, Baseren M. Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 23210859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results. Karaman E, Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gorucu J. Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23092148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Erbas Unverdi G, Atac SA, Cehreli ZC. Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yıldız E. J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pit and fissure sealing. Bonding of bulk-cured, low-filled, light-curing resins to bacteria-contaminated uncut enamel in high c-factor cavities. Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 15810478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of two fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical follow-up. Yildiz E, Dörter C, Efes B, Koray F. J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):979-84. PubMed ID: 15387838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealant bonded using sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation adhesives: An in vivo study. Nirwan M, Nigam AG, Marwah N, Nayak UA, Bansal A, Gahlot MS. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017 Oct; 35(4):359-366. PubMed ID: 28914250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention and effectiveness of fissure sealants in Kuwaiti school children. Francis R, Mascarenhas AK, Soparkar P, Al-Mutawaa S. Community Dent Health; 2008 Dec; 25(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 19149297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Khare M, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A. Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Nov; 27(6):444-453. PubMed ID: 28024165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Surface Sealant Reapplication on Clinical Performance of HEMA-containing and HEMA-free Self-etch Adhesives: Two-year Results. Tekçe N, Demirci M, Tuncer S, Göktürk SA. Oper Dent; 2018 Nov; 43(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 29782221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive. Ntaoutidou S, Arhakis A, Tolidis K, Kotsanos N. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(6):431-437. PubMed ID: 30328064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]