These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
85 related items for PubMed ID: 19963422
1. Using the "STEP Test" to evaluate processing speed in Moroccan hospitals. Nfaoiu K, Bentayeb F, Basraoui O, Azevedo AC. Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19963422 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitometric control of roentgen film processors. Forsberg H. Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 2958043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film. Matthee MJ, Becker PJ, Seeliger JE. J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic film processors' quality control test in Greek military hospitals. Lymberis C, Efstathopoulos EP, Manetou A, Poudridis G. Eur J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 16(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 8508847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme. Law J. Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film. Fjellström CA, Fredholm U, Julin P, Rehnmark S. Swed Dent J; 1986 Feb; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films. Thunthy KH, Hashimoto K, Weinberg R. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film? Petersson A, Lindh C, Nilsson M. Swed Dent J; 1987 Jul; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]