These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

218 related items for PubMed ID: 19998198

  • 1. Conflating scientific with clinical considerations.
    van der Graaf R, van Delden JJ.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):58-9. PubMed ID: 19998198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A clinical perspective on placebo research: looking back, looking forward.
    Dworkin RW.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):54-5. PubMed ID: 19998196
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Research, medicine, and "placebos".
    Moerman DE.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):64-5. PubMed ID: 19998201
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Strengthening Howick's argument against the alleged superiority of placebo-controlled trials.
    Rennie S, Stürmer T.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):62-4. PubMed ID: 19998200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ethical issues in the difference between placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials.
    Petrini C.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):56-8. PubMed ID: 19998197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Questioning the methodologic superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials.
    Howick J.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):34-48. PubMed ID: 19998192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Who's in control of the choice of control?
    Anderson JA.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):60-2. PubMed ID: 19998199
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reviewing the unsubstantiated claims for the methodological superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials: reply to open peer commentaries.
    Howick J.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):W5-7. PubMed ID: 19998178
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. I thought we were in this together?
    Trachtman H.
    Am J Bioeth; 2002 Sep; 2(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 12189071
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Placebo misconceptions.
    Senn S.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):53-4. PubMed ID: 19998195
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Preparing for a post-placebo paradigm: ethics and choice of control in clinical trials.
    Nunn R.
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):51-2. PubMed ID: 19998194
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Doctor vs. scientist?
    Jansen LA.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2008 Sep; 38(2):3. PubMed ID: 18457215
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
    Orentlicher D.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005 Sep; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. What it takes to defend deceptive placebo use.
    Barnhill A.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2011 Sep; 21(3):219-50. PubMed ID: 22073816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A normative justification for distinguishing the ethics of clinical research from the ethics of medical care.
    Litton P, Miller FG.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005 Sep; 33(3):566-74. PubMed ID: 16240736
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
    VanderWalde AM.
    Am J Bioeth; 2004 Sep; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.