These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

164 related items for PubMed ID: 20001936

  • 21. The biomechanical consequence of insufficient femoral component lateralization and exposed cancellous bone in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Olsen M, Davis ET, Whyne CM, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH.
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081011. PubMed ID: 20670060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Harris WH.
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A biomechanical study of the Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty: effect of stem size on femoral neck fracture.
    Aghayan S, Shepherd DE, Davis ET.
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Aug; 227(8):913-8. PubMed ID: 23636766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
    Bengs BC, Sangiorgio SN, Ebramzadeh E.
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Failure of the modular neck in a total hip arthroplasty.
    Dangles CJ, Altstetter CJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1169.e5-7. PubMed ID: 19837558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F, Martelli S, Gill HS, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M.
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: the influence of the prosthesis size and positioning on the remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck.
    Dickinson AS, Taylor AC, Browne M.
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Feb; 224(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 20408488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Influence of cementing the pin on resistance to fracture in hip resurfacing.
    Schlegel UJ, Siewe J, Bitsch RG, Koebke J, Eysel P, Morlock MM.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Feb; 26(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 20934792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G.
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Biomechanical effect of mushroom shaped surface prosthesis on femoral neck after replacement].
    Zhang G, Jia Q, Gu H, Chen Z.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 23(12):1462-5. PubMed ID: 20073311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.