These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

337 related items for PubMed ID: 20018994

  • 21. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI, Murrie DC, Stejskal W, Colwell LH, Morris J, Chauhan P, Dietz P.
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Competence-related abilities and psychiatric symptoms: an analysis of the underlying structure and correlates of the MacCAT-CA and the BPRS.
    Jacobs MS, Ryba NL, Zapf PA.
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 17546483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. An analogue study of the factors influencing competency decisions.
    Blashfield RK, Robbins L, Barnard GW.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994 Feb; 22(4):587-94. PubMed ID: 7718931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The performance of incarcerated juveniles on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA).
    Ficke SL, Hart KJ, Deardorff PA.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006 Feb; 34(3):360-73. PubMed ID: 17032960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Competency to stand trial in preadjudicated and petitioned juvenile defendants.
    Baerger DR, Griffin EF, Lyons JS, Simmons R.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003 Feb; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 14584530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Convergent validity of a screening measure designed to identify defendants feigning knowledge deficits related to competence to stand trial.
    Otto RK, Musick JE, Sherrod C.
    Assessment; 2011 Mar; 18(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20634419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
    Burrows M, Reid WH.
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N, Völlm B.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A study of criminal defendants referred for competency to stand trial in New York City.
    Bluestone H, Melella J.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979 Nov; 7(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 540167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.