These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

418 related items for PubMed ID: 20022892

  • 1. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM, Giordano D, Maiorana F, Greco M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC.
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ, Palomo JM, Baden S, Hans MG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study.
    Schulze RK, Gloede MB, Doll GM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 12490875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Direct digital lateral cephalometry: the effects of JPEG compression on image quality.
    Wenger NA, Tewson DH, McDonald F.
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 16290207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagci A.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K, Isik F, Trakyali G, Arun T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
    Stathopoulos V, Poulton DR.
    Angle Orthod; 1990 Feb; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL, Silveira HE.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.