These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

275 related items for PubMed ID: 20031482

  • 21. "Why the hell do we need electronic health records?". EHR acceptance among physicians in private practice in Austria: a qualitative study.
    Hackl WO, Hoerbst A, Ammenwerth E.
    Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 21057716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Overcoming barriers to EHR adoption.
    Haughom J, Kriz S, McMillan DR.
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2011 Jul; 65(7):96-100. PubMed ID: 21789950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. From electronic medical record to personal health records: present situation and trends in European Union in the area of electronic healthcare records.
    Iakovidis I.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998 Jul; 52 Pt 1():suppl 18-22. PubMed ID: 10384547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Critical areas of national electronic health record programs-is our focus correct?
    Deutsch E, Duftschmid G, Dorda W.
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Mar; 79(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 20079685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet.
    Pennbridge J, Moya R, Rodrigues L.
    West J Med; 1999 Mar; 171(5-6):302-5. PubMed ID: 10639865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Sharable EHR systems in Finland.
    Harno K, Ruotsalainen P.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006 Mar; 121():364-70. PubMed ID: 17095834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Security challenges in integration of a PHR-S into a standards based national EHR.
    Mense A, Hoheiser Pförtner F, Sauermann S.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014 Mar; 205():241-5. PubMed ID: 25160182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Which functionalities are available in the electronic health record systems used by French general practitioners? An assessment study of 15 systems.
    Darmon D, Sauvant R, Staccini P, Letrilliart L.
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jan; 83(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 24231269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Measurement of the utilization of an installed electronic health record.
    Dullabh P, Moiduddin A, Babalola E.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010 Jan; 160(Pt 1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20841654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
    Abdolrasulnia M, Menachemi N, Shewchuk RM, Ginter PM, Duncan WJ, Brooks RG.
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2008 Jan; 33(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18580304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
    Andrews L, Gajanayake R, Sahama T.
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):889-900. PubMed ID: 25200198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Satisfaction after the transition between electronic health record systems at six ambulatory practices.
    Pfoh ER, Abramson E, Zandieh S, Edwards A, Kaushal R.
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 18(6):1133-9. PubMed ID: 21883714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A cross-sectional survey exploring attitudes towards provincial electronic health record implementation among clients attending the Provincial Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic in British Columbia.
    Pedersen H, Taylor D, Gilbert M, Achen M, Lester R, Ogilvie G.
    Sex Transm Infect; 2015 Feb; 91(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 25480149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research.
    Hummers-Pradier E, Scheidt-Nave C, Martin H, Heinemann S, Kochen MM, Himmel W.
    Fam Pract; 2008 Apr; 25(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 18417465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The good, the bad and the early adopters: providers' attitudes about a common, commercial EHR.
    Makam AN, Lanham HJ, Batchelor K, Moran B, Howell-Stampley T, Kirk L, Cherukuri M, Samal L, Santini N, Leykum LK, Halm EA.
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Feb; 20(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23962319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists.
    Porteous T, Bond C, Robertson R, Hannaford P, Reiter E.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Mar; 53(488):204-9. PubMed ID: 14694696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.