These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 20046658

  • 21. United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus other disposable pens.
    Fischer JS, Edelman SV, Schwartz SL.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2008 Nov; 2(6):1157-60. PubMed ID: 19885306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A Pan-European and Canadian prospective survey to evaluate patient satisfaction with the SoloSTAR insulin injection device in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
    Hancu N, Czupryniak L, Genestin E, Sourij H.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep 01; 5(5):1224-34. PubMed ID: 22027323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Insulin pen needles: effects of extra-thin wall needle technology on preference, confidence, and other patient ratings.
    Aronson R, Gibney MA, Oza K, Bérubé J, Kassler-Taub K, Hirsch L.
    Clin Ther; 2013 Jul 01; 35(7):923-933.e4. PubMed ID: 23790553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparative device assessments: Humalog KwikPen compared with vial and syringe and FlexPen.
    Ignaut DA, Schwartz SL, Sarwat S, Murphy HL.
    Diabetes Educ; 2009 Jul 01; 35(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 19783767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Accuracy and preference assessment of prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe with diabetes patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.
    Pfützner A, Bailey T, Campos C, Kahn D, Ambers E, Niemeyer M, Guerrero G, Klonoff D, Nayberg I.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 May 01; 29(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 23402225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Analysis of studies that compare the dose accuracy of prefilled insulin pens.
    Crowe D.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Jan 01; 3(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 20046659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Prefilled insulin device with reduced injection force: patient perception and accuracy.
    Pfützner A, Reimer T, Hohberg C, Frøkjaer LP, Jørgensen C.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Sep 01; 24(9):2545-9. PubMed ID: 18674410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. An evaluation of prefilled insulin pens: a focus on the Next Generation FlexPen(®).
    Davis EM, Sexson EL, Spangler ML, Foral PA.
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2010 Sep 01; 3():41-50. PubMed ID: 22915920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of injection force of three insulin delivery pens.
    Asakura T, Seino H, Kageyama M, Yohkoh N.
    Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2009 Jun 01; 10(9):1389-93. PubMed ID: 19466910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Humalog(®) KwikPen™: an insulin-injecting pen designed for ease of use.
    Schwartz SL, Ignaut DA, Bodie JN.
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Nov 01; 7(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 21050084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.